STUDENTS EVALUATION OF TEACHING PROCESSES AND THEIR ACADEMICS PERFORMANCE
- Project Research
- 1-5 Chapters
- Quantitative
- ANOVA
- Abstract : Available
- Table of Content: Available
- Reference Style: APA
- Recommended for : Educators
- NGN 3000
Background to the Problem
The sustainability of any education system, whether formal or informal, is dependent on teacher effectiveness, teacher quality, and learners comprehension of the subject presented. According to Mayer and Ibrahim (2015), education is the deliberate process of attempting to change behavior in socially desirable directions through learning. As observed by Farrell & Farmer (2017), learning may be defined as permanent change since it is brought about in students by a teacher through tactics such as improving certain abilities, altering some attitudes, or comprehending specific scientific laws that operate within a learning environment. However, in order to be an engaged learner in a formal school, each student expects to be regarded as an adult learner with some control over the learning environment, such as the ability to ask questions and clarify uncertainties (Godfrey 2015). That is, student anticipate having control over the learning process. To buttress further, David (2017) asserts that students expect their teacher to be cooperative and amusing, to educate clearly and to utilize relevant examples so that the course content being taught becomes easy to learn, which is becoming increasingly important in classrooms today.
Etymologically, the teaching and learning process may be regarded as a knowledge transformation process from teachers to students. It includes procedures such as preparation, execution, assessment, and revision of a specified learning aim. Regardless, it important to establish an evaluation mechanism to gauge the effectiveness of the process. According to Jones (2015) evaluating instructional processes becomes required in order to identify the extent to which socially desirable behaviour is being attained by students who has been exposed to a teaching-learning situation. Smith (2010) referenced in Chen & Hoshower (2019) submits that evaluation is the process of acquiring and assessing data about students' challenges and progress toward reaching desired educational goals. It is a vital and necessary component of all learning.
On the importance of evaluating the teaching process, Marsh (2020) averred that feedback and evaluation provided by students are intuitively one of the most essential tools for student learning, instructor effectiveness, and professional growth which is phenomenally identified as Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET). Student evaluations of an instructor, according to Theall, Abrami, and Mets (2016), gives a reliable, valid appraisal of that teacher's efficacy, especially when assessments represent the perspectives of a considerable number of students participating in multiple course settings. Murdoch (2010) mentioned in Ryan Anderson & Birchler, (2018) believes that while students' perspectives should be addressed in a teacher-supportive evaluation system, teacher assessment is generally viewed as secondary in contrast to problems such as updating curricula and teaching materials and introducing new technologies. Murray (2017) added that SET may also be utilized to build materials and programmes while keeping the student viewpoint in mind.
On the other hand, several scholars has perused the shortcomings of Student Evaluation of Teaching. Renaud & Murray (2015) asserts that one of its detrimental effects on academic skills has been discovered, since it may promote grade inflation and degrade academic standards. The author further posits that faculty members are hesitant to assign low grades since they are aware that student ratings are considered in personnel decisions. They believe that bad grades will result in students seeking retaliation in the form of negative teacher evaluations, and that instructors will respond by boosting grades, implying that SET may not be a reliable grading system. In support of Renaud & Murray (2015) idea, Ory, & Ryan (2018) asserts that at least one-third of teachers in their survey had significantly reduced their grading criteria and degree of course difficulty. In one study by Marsh (2020), it was also shown that students feel instructors frequently overlook the outcomes of student evaluations of instruction, which causes them to get disheartened and cease revealing their true ideas .
Despite its limitations, student evaluation of teaching (SET) is becoming more common in the education industry. As a result, research has concentrated on expanding knowledge of the factors influencing SET, its significance to student academic performance as well as how to structure SET in terms of content and administration.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
In recent times, it appears that the problem of weak conceptual comprehension of some essential subject has resurfaced in the educational sector such that students frequently have difficulties to study and do not attain success as a result of their efforts. According to Patrick (2015), this could be due to the fact that they do not establish adequate comprehension of basic concepts in each subject as explained by the teacher, or the teacher did not use appropriate pedagogy during the teaching-learning process, which disrupts realization of the learning objectives. David ( 2017) lament that it is pitiful that some teachers are unable to teach subjects that exemplify students' life experiences in their environment; most of their lessons are abstract and involve purposeless modification of numbers, symbols, and relationships (especially in subjects like mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology), while providing non-scholastic interpretation for concepts and phenomena in art and commercial subjects. According to Jones (2016), most students nowadays are unable to understand essential ideas in chemical processes, display competency in abilities such as problem solving, critical thinking, mastery and comprehension of scientific techniques and processes, and applying information in real-life settings.
The aforementioned issues, among many others, have intensified researchers' and educators' concern about the necessity to evaluate educational procedures using students' judgement. Murray (2016) asserts that student assessment of teaching is fast expanding over the world and has an influence on three areas: faculty personnel choices, teaching quality improvement, and academic achievement. They go on to say that student evaluation of instruction, particularly written comments, makes teacher evaluation data more compelling and relevant, and hence contributes to teaching improvement. McKeachie (2006) cited in Mayer & Ibrahim (2015) on contrarily identifies four major criticisms of Student Evaluation of Teaching where they criticized that using SET, students are unable to make informed and consistent judgments about their instructors; students are unable to make accurate judgments until a certain period of time has elapsed after the course; student ratings are negatively related to student learning; and student ratings are based on expected grades in the course. From the authors study, they established that student evaluation of teaching processes should not be the only basis for administrative decisions like promotion, retention or lay-off of teacher, even though SET is necessary for improving teachers effectiveness which in turn promotes learning outcome.
Notably, although various studies has been conducted on student evaluation of teaching (SET) with emphasis on teacher’s performance, little or no attention has been given to how student evaluation of teaching process impacts their academic performance. Upon this premise, the researcher seeks to close the perceived gap on students evaluation of teaching processes and their academics performance.
Related Project Materials
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES IN HOST COMMUNITIES BY TERTIARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH-SOUTH NIGERIA
Background to the Study
Nations all over the world are concerned about and interested in education, both at national and...
FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT AND PREVENTION IN FIDUCIARY ACCOUNTING
FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT AND PREVENTION IN FIDUCIARY ACCOUNTING
This research aims to (1) evaluate the methods used by fidu...
THE INFLUENCE OF NIGERIA ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD IN FINANCIAL REPORTING
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out on the influence of Nigeria accounting standard board in financial...
COLLAPSE OF TEXTILE INDUSTRY IN NIGERIA
ABSTRACT
This study focuses on the Collapse of Textile Industry in Nigeria: A Study of Kano State, Nigeria.The particular focus of this s...
THE EFFECT OF QUALITY SERVICE DELIVERY ON CUSTOMERS PATRONAGE IN THE BANKING INDUSTRY OF NIGERIA (FIRST BANK PLC,)
ABSTRACT
This research work revealed the effect of quality service delivery on customers’ patronage in First Bank...
INFLUENCE OF WORK-LIFE BALANCE ON THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS AMONG NURSES IN OSUN STATE.
ABSTRACT
The Nursing profession has been known to be an integral part of the health care system, they a...
EFFECT OF PEER GROUP AND PARENTAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC BACKGROUND ON CAREER CHOICE OF BUSINESS EDUCATION UNDERGRADUATE IN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION IN LAGOS STATE.
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out on the effect of peer group and parental socio-economic background...
IMPACT OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT ON THE STAFF EFFICIENCY IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR OF NIGERIA (A CASE STUDY OF IBADAN NORTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA)
ABSTRACT
This study examines impact of training and development on the staff efficiency in the public sector of Nigeria....
ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC STRUCTURE OF CLARIAS GARIEPINUS, BURCHELL, 1822 POPULATION IN ASEJIRE LAKE
Abstract
Wild brood-stock is a major genetic reservoir for sustainable culture of Clarias gariepinus. This has been observed to be declin...
EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL ON TEACHING SOCIAL STUDIES EDUCATION
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out to examine the effect of instructional material on teaching so...
